The Quest of Baojender by Ramu Upadhaya is a deeply reflective, intellectually demanding work that resists easy classification. Positioned somewhere between novel, philosophical memoir, socio-political chronicle, and ethical testimony, the book offers a sustained meditation on the lived realities of North Cachar Hills, now known as Dima Hasao, in Assam. Rather than presenting a conventional narrative arc driven by dramatic conflict and resolution, the text unfolds as a series of observations, reflections, and moral interrogations voiced through its unusual protagonist, who appears under three names: Baojender, Wiso, and Charming Posse. The result is a work that privileges thought over action and conscience over spectacle, demanding from its reader patience, attentiveness, and ethical engagement.
At its core, The Quest of Baojender is not about conquest or adventure in the traditional sense implied by the word “quest”. Instead, it documents an inward and outward search for meaning, legitimacy, and moral clarity in a region marked by political neglect, environmental degradation, and fractured identities. The book’s setting is not merely a backdrop but an active presence. The hills, forests, rivers, and small towns of Dima Hasao shape the protagonist’s worldview as profoundly as any human relationship. Through this intimate engagement with place, Upadhaya foregrounds the Northeast not as a peripheral curiosity but as a central moral and political question within the Indian imagination.
The protagonist’s triple identity is one of the book’s most distinctive features. Baojender represents a spiritual and symbolic attachment to the land, almost a metaphysical citizenship rooted in emotional belonging rather than legal status. Wiso, derived from “Wi,” meaning “wish,” and “So,” meaning “living,” articulates the existential dimension of the character, a self-conscious attempt to live meaningfully amid decay and disappointment. Charming Posse, or CP, is the intellectual persona, sharp, ironic, and often unsparing in critique. These identities are not separate characters but shifting registers through which the same consciousness speaks. This fluidity allows the narrative to move between lyrical reflection, ethical rumination, and incisive political commentary, though it may initially unsettle readers accustomed to stable characterisation.
One of the most compelling aspects of Baojender’s character is his position as a “non-tribal by birth” who has lived as an “educated tribal at heart”. This hybrid identity places him in a persistent state of in-betweenness. To the mainland, he is racially othered, dismissed with slurs that expose the deep communication gap between Northeast India and the rest of the country. To sections of the local population, he remains a settler, never fully entitled to speak with authority despite decades of commitment to the land and its people. This double marginalisation is not presented melodramatically. Instead, it is rendered as a quiet, enduring ache that sharpens the protagonist’s sensitivity to injustice and hypocrisy.
The narrative’s socio-political critique is both detailed and relentless. Upadhaya introduces the idea of the “Claimant Band” to describe local leadership and political actors who claim authority over the land while systematically betraying its people. Through anecdotal vignettes and reflective commentary, the book exposes how corruption has become normalised, how public funds are siphoned off, and how governance is reduced to a mechanism for personal enrichment. The absence of basic amenities such as clean water, functional roads, and quality education is presented not as a failure of resources but as a failure of will and ethics. Baojender’s anger, however, is controlled. He writes not as a revolutionary but as a disappointed guardian who believes that leadership should be an act of service rather than domination.
Education emerges as one of the book’s central moral concerns. The decline of academic standards in Haflong and surrounding areas is described with a sense of urgency and sorrow. Students are passed without merit, institutions function without accountability, and learning is reduced to a hollow ritual. Baojender’s frustration is directed not at the youth but at a system that robs them of dignity by denying them real competence. As an ardent educator, he repeatedly urges young people to acquire languages, skills, and global awareness, warning them that symbolic success without substance will only deepen their vulnerability. In this sense, the book reads as an extended plea for intellectual honesty.
Environmental degradation is another dominant theme, articulated through the powerful idea of “eco-anxiety”. The hills of Dima Hasao, once abundant with forests and water, are depicted as wounded landscapes. Deforestation, unregulated extraction, and short-sighted development have led to water scarcity, drying rivers, and ecological imbalance. The Kopili river, in particular, functions as both a literal and symbolic marker of loss. Once a life-giving force, it now reflects the consequences of collective negligence. Upadhaya’s environmental critique is inseparable from his political critique. The destruction of nature is shown to be the direct outcome of corrupt governance and moral indifference.
Identity politics forms one of the book’s most complex and sensitive areas of engagement. The region’s ethnic diversity, which should have been a source of cultural richness, is described as having devolved into what the author calls a “Caricature of Heterogeneity”. Dimasas, Nagas, Kukis, Bengalis, and other groups are pitted against one another in cycles of suspicion and violence. Baojender refuses to align himself with any faction, identifying instead as a “Non-Aligned Human”. This stance is both his strength and his limitation. It grants him moral clarity but also condemns him to political powerlessness. His advocacy of unity and concord is not naïve but deeply ethical, rooted in the conviction that peace cannot be achieved through exclusion or domination.
The protagonist’s philosophical orientation further distinguishes the book from conventional political fiction. He is sceptical of organised religion, particularly where it legitimises violence. His spirituality is grounded in nature, human dignity, and ethical conduct rather than dogma. His vegetarianism and pacifism are presented not as lifestyle choices but as moral positions that reject gluttony, cruelty, and excess. His identification as a feminist is similarly understated yet significant. By acknowledging the resilience and historical agency of women in the region, he challenges patriarchal norms without resorting to polemic.
Structurally, the book adopts a fragmented, essayistic form. Chapters often read like self-contained meditations, connected more by thematic continuity than by plot progression. This approach reinforces the sense that the book is a chronicle rather than a story in the traditional sense. The pacing is slow, sometimes deliberately so, encouraging readers to pause and reflect rather than rush forward. The language is formal, dense, and idiosyncratic, marked by coinages and philosophical phrasing. While this style enhances the book’s seriousness, it may also limit its accessibility for casual readers.
The concluding sections of The Quest of Baojender refuse closure. There is no triumphant resolution, no dramatic reversal of fortune. Instead, the narrative ends in a state of impasse. The future of Dima Hasao remains uncertain, clouded by unresolved ethnic tensions, environmental crises, and moral fatigue. Baojender accepts his role as a silent witness, a self-appointed watchman bound by his own ethical constraints. The metaphor of flies congregating without direction captures the region’s political life in restless stagnation. For the reader, this ending is likely to provoke mixed emotions. There is frustration at the absence of solutions, admiration for the protagonist’s integrity, and a lingering sadness at the squandered potential of a beautiful land.
As an impartial reader, one is compelled to acknowledge that The Quest of Baojender offers no easy comfort. Its message is sobering rather than consolatory. It insists that genuine autonomy cannot be built on violence or exclusion, that leadership demands conscience as much as authority, and that environmental and moral degradation are inseparable. Technically, the book’s strengths lie in its conceptual ambition, regional specificity, and ethical seriousness. Its limitations stem from the same qualities. The dense prose, slow pace, and absence of a conventional plot may alienate readers seeking narrative momentum.
In terms of literary positioning, the book is best described as auto-fictional socio-political philosophy or regional philosophical fiction. It stands closer to a reflective chronicle than to mainstream Indian novels. Among works on Northeast India, it occupies a valuable place as a document of lived experience and moral resistance. It may not achieve wide commercial popularity, but it possesses lasting relevance for readers interested in governance, identity, ecology, and the ethics of belonging.
Ultimately, The Quest of Baojender is a book that asks more of its readers than it gives in narrative pleasure. It demands intellectual patience and ethical attention. Those who invest their time will emerge not entertained in the conventional sense but altered, burdened with a deeper understanding of a neglected region and a renewed awareness of what conscientious leadership and moral responsibility might entail in a fractured world.
Get a copy from Amazon India – click here.
Dr Alok Mishra for Indian Book Critics
Thanks for reading!
